In a business-as-usual scenario, companies find it very challenging to implement carbon emission reduction activities in the business. It is due to factors such as lack of funds, outdated technology, high risks, and talent gaps. As a result, if companies still implement carbon emission reduction activities out of goodwill, we refer to such activities as an additionality, but this is exactly the reason why green enterprises are oftentimes unable to acquire carbon rights.

Very odd? A simple analogy would be two students taking the same test – one of the students being an overachiever (green enterprises) and other one just your average Joe (non-green, regular companies). Getting a 90 on the test is nothing unusual for the overachiever, so she will not receive additional rewards (carbon rights) for accomplishing the feat. However, for the average student who usually gets a 60 on his exam. If he scores a 70 on his exam, people will praise his efforts and shower him with prizes, who then takes the carbon rights and exchanges them for cash.

Get complete series of the glossary accordingly, make sure you are ahead of others

為什麼太陽能和風力發電很難拿到碳權?

【綠色帶路人的心底話】減碳人人歡迎鼓勵,但拿到碳權才是另一個戰場的開端。對於核發碳權的主管機關而言,「如果這個減量計畫本來就可以讓企業賺錢(或省錢),為何需要額外核發碳權呢?」

2017/03/20
我可以拿家裡屋頂太陽能的碳權去賣錢嗎?

【綠色帶路人的心底話】「若碳權買賣可行,我可以拿屋頂太陽能的碳權去賣錢嗎?」

2017/03/28

Knowledge

No.183為什麼說儲能沒救了,大家都還在培養儲能專案經理?
2024-05-21 股神巴菲特說,要在別人恐懼時貪婪!聰明的人懂得逢低進場,才不會等到商機再次降臨時,跟著大家一窩蜂,搶不到人才,做不了事。
【行內人心底話】比黃金還厲害的「黑金」綠電登台!
2024-05-27 再生能源中容量因數第二名屬於廢棄物發電,也就是燒垃圾,燒垃圾也衍生出空污議題,有無更好的解方呢?