In a business-as-usual scenario, companies find it very challenging to implement carbon emission reduction activities in the business. It is due to factors such as lack of funds, outdated technology, high risks, and talent gaps. As a result, if companies still implement carbon emission reduction activities out of goodwill, we refer to such activities as an additionality, but this is exactly the reason why green enterprises are oftentimes unable to acquire carbon rights.

Very odd? A simple analogy would be two students taking the same test – one of the students being an overachiever (green enterprises) and other one just your average Joe (non-green, regular companies). Getting a 90 on the test is nothing unusual for the overachiever, so she will not receive additional rewards (carbon rights) for accomplishing the feat. However, for the average student who usually gets a 60 on his exam. If he scores a 70 on his exam, people will praise his efforts and shower him with prizes, who then takes the carbon rights and exchanges them for cash.

Get complete series of the glossary accordingly, make sure you are ahead of others

為什麼太陽能和風力發電很難拿到碳權?

【綠色帶路人的心底話】減碳人人歡迎鼓勵,但拿到碳權才是另一個戰場的開端。對於核發碳權的主管機關而言,「如果這個減量計畫本來就可以讓企業賺錢(或省錢),為何需要額外核發碳權呢?」

2017/03/20
我可以拿家裡屋頂太陽能的碳權去賣錢嗎?

【綠色帶路人的心底話】「若碳權買賣可行,我可以拿屋頂太陽能的碳權去賣錢嗎?」

2017/03/28

Knowledge

No. 203 美國安永專家分享國際企業減碳路徑實務
2025-04-14 「我是永續部專員,聽說SBTi因為減碳路徑的邏輯鬧內鬨,如果他們倒了,我們自行制定的減碳目標最後未達標,影響企業的ESG評級,可能會害我被老闆罵。我們應該依循什麼樣的邏輯來設定比較務實的減碳路徑?」
公司儲能系統評估與建置即戰力班:廠務與服務商共學圈
2025-12-15 用電大戶年減1%的節能目標實行到今天這麼多年,就像擰毛巾一樣,擰到毛巾都快乾了,現在還要上調至年減1.5%,如何是好?